The boy's name was Michael, and he was a 10-year-old from Coffeyville who was too close to death.
Michael had a medical insurance card, but lacked access to care, and it was showing in his mouth. He had a severe abscess in one of his teeth, and by the time he got to the Community Health Center of Southeast Kansas, he had spiked a high fever. The doctors and dentists there were able to help him, pull the tooth and prevent anything bad from happening, but it was too close a situation said Krista Postai, CHC/SEK chief executive officer.
"Now he's just a happy little boy from Coffeyville," Postai said. "But it also shows some of the problems that people have been having with health care."
The health care system is one that both candidates for U.S. President, U.S. Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill. and U.S. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., have pledged to fix. But both will face an uphill battle against a topic that Jonathan Davis, Mt. Carmel Regional Medical Center chief executive officer, calls "extremely complicated."
The similarities
McCain's plan, which he referred to on his Web site as "common sense initiatives," includes increasing competition for drugs by importing them safely through other countries and by pushing for a faster introduction of generic drugs. It's a stance mirrored by Obama.
Obama's Web site writes of the need to straddle two extremes in health care – government run health care that drives up taxes or letting insurance companies operate "without rules."
Both are attempting to provide affordable, accessible health care, and both are for transparency in terms of both health care cost and quality. Both also acknowledge the importance of promoting public health and giving people the information needed to make healthy choices. Along with that, the need for early prevention and intervention is key, they said.
Both candidates have also stressed the importance of finding a way to help businesses with the cost of providing for employees, and have said they want to protect doctors against frivolous or overblown malpractice lawsuits.
The differences
But while many of the general parts of the plan are similar, the devil, as always, is in the details.
Obama's plan would require insurance companies to cover all pre-existing conditions so all Americans, regardless of health status or history can get comprehensive benefits at "fair and stable premiums." Obama said he wanted to lower costs for businesses by covering a portion of the health costs they pay in return for lower premiums for employees. He also said he would establish a National Health Insurance Exchange for with a range of private insurance options and a public plan based on benefits available made to members of Congress.
"Under the plan, if you like your current health insurance, nothing changes, except your costs will go down by as much as $2,500 per year," Obama said. "If you don't have health insurance, you will have a choice of new, affordable health insurance options."
Obama said he would ensure everyone who needs it will receive a tax credit for their premiums, and said he would pay for his reform effort by rolling back the Bush tax cuts for Americans earning more than $250,000 per year and retaining the estate tax at its 2009 level.
McCain's plan is based largely on allowing people to purchase health insurance nationwide, across state lines, and would reform the tax code to offer more choices beyond employer-based health coverage. He also favors insurance that follows from job to job.
While still having the option of employer-based health care, each family would receive a direct refundable tax credit of $2,500 for individuals and $5,000 for families to offset the cost of insurance, money that would be sent directly to the insurance provider. Those who obtain insurance that costs less than the credit can deposit the remainder in expanded health savings accounts.
McCain pledges to reform the payment systems in Medicaid and Medicare to compensate providers for diagnosis, prevention and care coordination. He said Medicaid and Medicare should not pay for preventable medical errors or mismanagement.