Dear Editor,
Patricia Houser’s column “Hatred” (13 November) claims that “Today it is difficult to find anyone in upper, or even mid level positions of authority, politician, bureaucrat, or military, who [is] not a member of one or more of the top seven non-governmental organizations working to create this Global Government.” This is a very specific charge, or rather it would be a very specific charge if Ms. Houser went on to name these seven NGOs she’s calling a corrosive influence on our critical institutions. She does not, however, and it’s typical of the columns I’ve seen from her so far: second-hand innuendo, massive logical leaps, not to mention an apocalyptic conspiracy version of American politics and culture. How are we supposed to take her views the slightest bit seriously if she won’t at least name names, explain her sources, give her readers the evidence to actually judge for ourselves whether she’s sensibly scared?
Respectfully,
Jonathan Dresner
Pittsburg
|
|
|
Dear Editor,
Patricia Houser’s column “Hatred” (13 November) claims that “Today it is difficult to find anyone in upper, or even mid level positions of authority, politician, bureaucrat, or military, who [is] not a member of one or more of the top seven non-governmental organizations working to create this Global Government.” This is a very specific charge, or rather it would be a very specific charge if Ms. Houser went on to name these seven NGOs she’s calling a corrosive influence on our critical institutions. She does not, however, and it’s typical of the columns I’ve seen from her so far: second-hand innuendo, massive logical leaps, not to mention an apocalyptic conspiracy version of American politics and culture. How are we supposed to take her views the slightest bit seriously if she won’t at least name names, explain her sources, give her readers the evidence to actually judge for ourselves whether she’s sensibly scared?
Respectfully,
Jonathan Dresner
Pittsburg
